

During oral submissions at the end of the trial, however, MediaTube maintained that certain claims of the 477 Patent were infringed, but only by virtue of the fact that Bell’s system could be modified to incorporate all of the essential elements of those claims. Second, it withdrew the claim for punitive damages. First, it acknowledged that Bell had never infringed the 477 Patent. As a result, at trial, MediaTube made two major admissions.
#MEDIATUBE REVIEW TV#
In the months leading up to the trial, Bell corrected some of the answers it gave during discoveries concerning its Fibe TV and FibreOp TV systems. Bell denied infringement and asserted that the claims of the 477 Patent were invalid. MediaTube Corp., licencee of the 477 Patent, brought a patent infringement action against Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communcations (collectively, “Bell”), alleging that their 477 Patent had been infringed by Bell’s Fibe TV and FibreOp TV services and severely damaged their business. concluded that he did not have jurisdiction to hear the applicant’s judicial interim release application, and dismissed the application.ĪPPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL DISMISSED Counsel for the applicant appeared in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta seeking judicial interim release pursuant to s. 33(8) of the YCJA.
#MEDIATUBE REVIEW TRIAL#
As such, the applicant was given an election as to mode of trial pursuant to sections 67(1)(d) and 67(1)(b) of the YCJA. The applicant elected to be tried by superior court judge alone with a preliminary inquiry. The Crown has given notice to seek an adult sentence if the applicant is convicted. The applicant is a young person within the meaning of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, SC 2002, c. 1 ( YCJA) who is charged with committing second degree murder.

Jean-Pierre DesmaraisĬriminal law - Young persons - Judicial Interim Release - Jurisdiction over bail Sherman, deceased, et al.Īutorité des marchés financiers v. Autorité des marchés financiersĬharter of Rights - Right to be tried within a reasonable time McGill University Health Centre, Jean-Marc Troquet Torts - Duty of care - Limitations of actions Alexander Bistricer, et al.Ĭarole Teitelbaum v. Joseph Rubner (also known as Yossi Rubner) and Marvin Rubner, in their capacity as Joint Attorneys for property acting under a Continuing Power of Attorney for Property granted by Eda Rubner dated Januv. Her Majesty the QueenĬriminal law - Evidence - Eyewitness identification Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services and Attorney General of ManitobaĬharter of Rights - Right to fair hearing Association Professionnelle des Ingénieurs du Gouvernement du QuébecĬharter of rights - Freedom of expression Geneviève GagnonĪttorney General of Quebec v. Intellectual property - Patents - Claims constructionĬharter of Rights - Rule of law - Civil procedureĪ, Inc., et al. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED SCC No.Ĭriminal law - Young persons - Judicial Interim ReleaseĪPPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL DISMISSED SCC No.
